A blog dedicated to education and awareness of Internet trolls and cyberstalkers.

Don't Feed the Troll

Online stalking on the increase

Cyber stalking is a growing problem with typical abusers being white collar workers without criminal records, according to the 2005 Cyberstalking statistics released today by Working to Halt Online Abuse.

Jayne Hitchcock, Working to Halt Online Abuse president, said: “They [cyber stalkers] can be teachers, lawyers, businesspeople, students, doctors, the kid who bags your groceries – online harassers and stalkers are not who you may think they are.”

She added that there is no sign that the distress caused by internet harassment was declining: “On average, we can see up to 50 cases a week. We don’t see cyberstalking going away. In fact, it is increasing every day, mainly due to the fact that more people go online for the first time every day. Currently there are over one billion people online worldwide – if only one percent become victims, that’s ten million people!”

Read more here: http://www.scmagazineuk.com/Online-stalking-on-the-increase/article/33024/

Tracking Internet stalkers and reporting them

I am quoting the following from an article I think any forum board owner should read:

Don’t underestimate the power of a board administrator. He/she has access to more then most people think, and can obtain even more information without much effort.

While the article was written in 2006, it’s tactics still work. Plus, depending on the type of forum board you are running, there are many modules that you can install to help you with the same result.

Read: http://johnbokma.com/mexit/2006/01/07/cyberstalkers-reporting.html

Troll Police Site News

It’s in the planning that this website will be getting the much needed attention I have been unable to give over the past year. I have some plans for expanding the Web site and its purpose.

 Some of the content needs to be updated and I want to include a database full of resources, hotlines and other information.

I felt it was important to let folks know that this site isn’t dead in the water I am getting quite a few emails asking about more resources, updates and suggestions for the site. Your voice has been heard. It thrills me that at the very least, the site is helping someone.

 I suspect that in April the changes I have in mind will be implemented.

Troll Police Turning It’s Focus on Sex Crimes Against Children

I have decided that I will be dedicating a lot more time to promoting awareness about online sex crimes against children. While in the past this site has provided information about “Internet Trolls” and the harm they can cause online communities; I feel dedicating more time to the prevention of sex crimes against children is more important. Obviously.

 Here’s just a look at the headlines:

Here are some links to some articles on the web about internet crimes against:

MINORS

–>In Danbury, Connecticut a  25 year old man is sentenced to thirty years in prison for strangling a sixth-grade girl he met in an internet chat room. This was not the only underage child he crossed state lines to have sex with.

Man get 30 years for raping and killing girl he met on internet

--> A girl chatted with a 31 year old man (who was a second lieutenant in the army) in an aol internet chat room, and scheduled a date to meet in person. The man picked her up and took her to his home, where they had sex. The man pleaded guilty and was sentenced  to one year in prison and 10 years probation.

Man gets year sentence for statutory rape of girl he met off internet

–> A 26-year-old Tennessee man met a 16-year-old girl in an Internet chat room and traveled to N.Y. to meet her. He had sex with her in his hotel room and has been sentenced to one to three years in prison for having sex with a teen-age girl he met over the Internet.

Man sentenced for having sex with teenager he met on internet

–>A man has been charged with sexually assaulting a teenager he met in an Internet chatroom. A 17-year-old told police she met a 56 year old man on the Internet and met him at a fast-food restaurant, and they went to a liquor store, and the man bought beer, tequila and vodka. At his home the girl drank alcohol, got drunk, vomited, and he began touching her. She told police she tried to get up but he held her down and then she passed out. When she woke up there were signs that she had been sexually assaulted, she said.

Man charged with sexual assault of girl he met on internet

–>The body of a 13 - year - old girl has been found, and the FBI has arrested a Brazilian national who allegedly met the girl on the Internet.  Sixth - grader Christina Long Connecticut girl who mysteriously vanished last week was found strangled in a Greenwich ravine yesterday after her aunt, Shelly Reilly, dropped her off at about 5:45 p.m. at the Danbury Fair Mall.

Cyber-suitor confesses to murder of teen

–>A thirty seven year old man is charged with a federal crime for allegedly taking a 14-year-old girl he met on the Internet in an aol chatroom to his home and having sex with her. Then, the two began an email correspondence and talked on the phone after her parents went to bed. After a while he reportedly flew to her state airport and then went to the girl’s home. He brought her a plane ticket to return to his home with him. There, FBI officials say, the two had sex. (HE was violating a federal law that prohibits an adult from taking a minor across state lines to have sex.)

Man confesses to sex with teen met in internet chatroom

–>Uk girl runs off with US man twice her age she met off the internet

–>A school bus driver  had sex with a 15-year-old girl after “meeting” her in an internet chat room. The 33 year old man contacted the girl on a website, and had sex with the girl at his home before returning her back home. The two spoke frequently on the internet and then made plans to meet. While the girl was with the man for the weekend, her parents reported her missing to police.

15 year old allegedly kidnapped by man she met on internet

–>A man was charged with the sexual molestation of a 13-year-old girl he met on the Internet. The 21 year old male  was arrested after he made contact with the girl on a website and then met with her and had sexual contact with her.

Guilty man molested girl he met on internet

–>52 year old man indicted on charges of using the internet to solicit sex from an underage girl. He was arrested when he went to  meet with the girl, who in reality was an undercover law enforcement officer. He contacted the 13-year-old girl in an Internet chat room and his messages sent through the internet to her described in detail the sexual activities that he wanted to do with the girl .

man indicted on charges of using the internet to solicit sex from minor

–>A 43 year old man  used the Internet and telephone conversations to discuss having unlawful sex with a 14-year-old girl. He pleaded guilty to one count of using the Internet to attempt to induce a minor to engage in criminal sexual activity and one count of possession of child pornography.
He wrote to a “MeganM” on the Internet and  during these online conversations, and during telephone conversations, he asked “MeganM” if she was interested in sex with older men, whether she was ready to lose her virginity, and why she would want to lose her virginity to an older man, and described in graphic detail the sexual activities he would engage in with “MeganM.” He arranged to meet with “MeganM” in person and when he arrived  he was arrested by special agents with the Federal Bureau of Investigation. “MeganM” was an undercover officer posing as a teenage girl.  When executing a search of his home is when the child pornography was found.

Canadian man guilty in internet sex case

–>A 23 year old Man was convicted  of traveling to have sex with a fourteen year old girl he met on the internet. He met the  14-year- old girl in a chat room on the Internet, and, after meeting the girl and learning her age, he continued to talk with her via internet email and on the telephone. He described in graphic detail the sexual activities he wanted to do with the girl. 

Man traveled to California to have sex with 14 year old girl he met on the internet

–>A pedophile who used the internet to groom two girls for sex has had his sentence increased .The girls he met over the internet were 13 when he had sex with them.

Pedophile used internet to groom underage girls for sex

–>A 27 year old  man charged in an Internet sex scheme, in which he allegedly tried to persuade a  girl to have sex with him last week, has been charged with six drug charges stemming from a search of his apartment. He was taken into custody after he drove to an  ice cream parlor to meet a 13-year-old girl whom he “met” over the Internet. Saying he was 19 and allegedly asked the girl for sex. . An indecency charge also is pending and that charge stems from an incident involving a 15-year-old girl.

Oxford man charged with internet sex scheme involving 13 year old girl

–>Police have charged  a 24-year-old man with five counts of second-degree sexual assault of a minor. When the man  learned his Internet friend was a 14-year-old girl but that did not stop him from having sex with her. He met the 14-year-old while on the Internet, and had extended conversations with her in chatrooms on the internet and asked her to meet him in person. He and the 14 year old had sex where he lives.

Man charged with having sex with girl he met on internet

–>A 23-year-old man was  charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old boy he met on the Internet. He will be  standing trial on charges of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, indecent assault, statutory sexual assault, corruption of minors and interfering with the custody of a minor. If convicted, he could face more than five years in prison. (The two met in an AOL chat room .)

Deliberations continue in internet sex case involving 14 year old boy

–>A 52-year-old man was accused of soliciting sex from a police officer posing on the Internet as a 14-year-old girl, and was charged in Louisa with a felony count of soliciting sex from a minor. A meeting was set up during an Internet chat. That’s when undercover officers arrested him.

Louisa man arrested for soliciting sex over the internet with police officer posing as 14 year old girl

–>Internet security specialist arrested for attempting to solicit sex with a minor

–>

A 12-year old female reported to her mother that while communicating with people in an Internet Chat Room she was sent unsolicited sexually explicit images from someone in the chat room. One of the victim’s family members signed on the Internet and received similar pornographic images from the same person. An Officer pretended to be a 12-year old female and made contact with the person who sent the images on the internet. An established  intimate relationship developed and  the officer was sent similar pornographic images, indicating that he wanted to meet with the 12-year old for love and a sexual relationship. Following a nearly three month investigation, officers found it was a 43-year old male. An arrangement was made for the 43 year old to drive to meet the 12-year old persona and engage in various sexual acts. The 43 year old was arrested as he approached a pre-arranged location area to meet the 12-year old. Prior to the meeting, he had instructed the undercover officer to delete all references to him in the persona’s computer. At the time of his arrest, he had in his possession, a digital camera, marijuana, etc. that he promised he would give to the “child” when he met her.

Registered sex offender arresting after attempt to seduce minor on the internet

–>A 27 year old man used a home computer to have an Internet chat with a person he believed to be a 13-year-old girl, and said he wanted to have sex, and he was arrested when he arrived at the meeting place.

Honolulu man used the internet to lure a child for sex is sentenced

–>A 30 year old male had sex with a 14 year old for a live web cam show. He claims the 14 year old in question had a fake Id claiming she was 20 years old. But he also went on to say that he never actually saw the Id himself. He thought she looked at least 18 she claimed to be 20.

Webmaster sentenced to six months for sex with minor on internet

–>A man 28 was sentenced to one to three years in prison for having sex with a 12-year-old girl he had been corresponding with on the internet for several months. The man pleaded guilty to statutory rape.

Man sentenced for having sex with 12 year old girl he met on the internet

–>Several stories about internet crimes involving minors

–>Lawyer turns self in on minor charge

–>An armed immigration officer who allegedly used the internet to solicit a sexual encounter with a teenage girl was arrested on his way to meet her. The 27-year-old has been charged with corruption of a minor and indecent assault, among other offences. He met the girl in an online chat room and told her he was 17, but after he sent a picture of himself, the girl became suspicious and told her father, who went to police.

Immigration officer allegedly used the internet to solicit sex with minor

–>A 53 year old teacher has been arrested after turning up at a restaurant expecting to see a 15-year-old boy he met on the internet. He had fixed up a meeting during three weeks of explicit chats in a gay chatroom. (The person he thought was a teenage boy was in fact an undercover police officer.) He is where the meeting was supposed to take place, and is expected to be charged with child enticement for immoral purposes and attempted sexual assault.

Teacher gets arrested after expecting to meet 15 year old at restaurant

–>A schoolgirl who disappeared with a man she met through an internet chatroom has returned home after almost three months. The 16-year-old was believed to be with a 20-year-old whom she met online last October.

Missing internet chat girl returns home after 3 months

–>A 26 year old man who lived in his 15-year-old girlfriend’s bedroom closet for weeks, pleaded guilty to sex with an underage girl and to photographing her in the nude. He was sentenced court to seven years in jail. (He had met the girl on the internet.) The man, a soldier, had deserted his Army unit Knox and was discovered when the girl’s mother found dishes, a pillow and other items in the closet.

Man lived in teenage girls closet that he met on the internet

–>Police say computer programmer traveled to Chicago believing he would have sex with a 14-year-old he met on the internet. He was charged with a felony and  if convicted, he could get 15 years in prison. After  he checked into a hotel, he was arrested when an undercover officer posing as a young girl arrived by cab to meet him. He had  sent sexually explicit messages and images to the officer and made arrangements to meet into have sex.

Computer tech goes to Chicago to meet with 14 year old he met on the internet for sex

–>A 61 year old man posed as a teenager in an internet chatroom and met a 16-year-old girl in person and assaulted her. The 61 year old first made contact with his alleged victim after posing as an 18-year-old in an internet chatroom and then telephoned the girl  claiming he was the 18 year olds  father and said his son had been in a serious car accident. He contacted the girl several times to give her news of his son’s “condition” before they agreed to meet When he met the girl he was alleged to have invited her to stay in a hotel before allegedly enticed her into his car where the alleged assault took place. It’s claimed the girl then escaped and contacted police.

Man poses as teenager to lure 16 year old

–>A teen is back at home safe and sound and an American teen who she met on the Internet has been charged with several counts including abducting a person under 16 years after the two were caught near a Greyhound bus. The 19 year old male located the 15-year-old girl with whom he’d been chatting on the Internet for several weeks and before long the two were in an allegedly stolen vehicle. The teens had been using the cell phones to do their on-line ‘chatting’ all summer.

Teen abducted by man on the internet

–>A 34-year old executive pleaded guilty today to a federal charge of traveling from Washington to California with the intent of engaging in a sex act with a 13-year-old girl he met on the Internet. and was arrested near the Santa Monica Pier on September 16 when he arrived to meet the 13-year-old child, who in fact was an undercover law enforcement officer, and admitted that he met the 13 year old in an Internet chat room and that he described the sexual acts that he wanted to engage in with the child. Over the next six months, he engaged in a series of conversations with the “girl,” whom he believed to be 13 years old.

Executive pleads guilty to having sex with minor he met on internet

–>University sophomore has been accused of having sex with a 14-year-old girl he met on the Internet. The 19, was arrested and has been charged with two counts of first-degree sexual assault of a child. He met the girl online,  and he picked her up from her home and brought her back to his dorm where they had sex.

Student charged with sexual assault of girl he met on the internet

–>Teen killed by man she met on Internet. A Connecticut man has been charged with manslaughter after he admitted to strangling a 13-year-old girl he met on the Internet.

  Teen killed by man she met on the internet

–>A 35-year-old man was arrested after deputies said he had sex with a 17-year-old boy whom he met on the Internet, and faces a charge of unlawful sexual activity with a minor. The deputies asked him what he was doing, and he said he had just visited a man he met on the Internet As deputies continued investigating, they discovered that he had performed sex acts on a 17-year-old boy

Man accused of sex with 17 year old boy he met off the internet

–>A 27-year-old man is charged with having sex with a 14-year-old girl he met over the Internet that follows 2 earlier cases of harassment of teenagers. He has been charged with second-degree rape, second-degree sodomy and two counts of endangering the welfare of a child after he allegedly brought the girl to his home to have sex with her. The two struck up a relationship in an Internet chat room and they then decided to meet in public. The man then  drove her to his home and allegedly had sex. The 27 year old has been convicted twice before for harassment in incidents involving teens he met over the Internet : for groping a 17-year-old girl  he met over the Internet, and  was also convicted of second-degree harassment over a telephone incident involving a teenage girl he had previously met on the Internet.

Man had sex with 14 year old he met in chatroom

–>Two men have been arrested in China on suspicion of raping and murdering at least six girls after arranging dates with them over the internet. The pair were arrested after police posing as potential dates arranged over the internet to meet them. The bodies of six victims were exhumed from under a building materials shop, and a  home the two used for their “meetings”. The victims ages are believed to range between the ages of 12 and 17.

China arrests 2 men over internet rapes and murders

–>A 15-year-old girl was raped after she met a man she contacted through internet messages. The teen  had begun a internet relationship with the man after a friend met him on an internet chat, and he is supposedly about 24 years of age. When they walked to a nearby park he subjected her to a horrendous attack. After raping her in broad daylight, he followed her as she walked to get a bus home before disappearing, a police spokeswoman said.

Man rapes girl he met after internet chat

–>A 13-year old girl was murdered by a 25 year old man she met through an online chat room. Christina Long,  was found strangled days after she disappeared. and Police allege she had gone to meet the man for the first time after they had sent “graphic” online messages to each other. Police say she used almost a dozen provocative screen names on the America Online account she had.  The married man confessed to the killing and led police and FBI agents to the body. .The killing brought more warnings to parents about the dangers on the internet for their children.

13  year old girl murdered by man from internet chatroom

–>The new offence of “sexual grooming” would make it illegal for adults to meet or arrange to meet someone under 16 to engage in sexual activity. It is designed to stop pedophiles contacting children on the internet but would also cover adults who may be in contact with children for legitimate reasons, such as piano teachers or Scout leaders, who at some point decide to move the contact on to a sexual level. The announcement follows a series of high profile cases. Three judges in the Court of Appeal last month warned men who use internet chatrooms to groom young girls for sex of lengthy jail terms, as they added 18 months to a three-year sentence for a Cambridge pedophile who sexually abused two 13-year-old girls. A 46 year old man  who is believed to be the most prolific internet groomer ever, last month received a five-year prison sentence for a series of offences. The former postal worker was found with a hand-written sexual profile of 54 youngsters from the UK and 19 from abroad. He bombarded some of the girls, aged as young as 13, with up to 100 phone calls after befriending them on the Internet. At the time of his conviction, the Home Office said the new legislation could have meant a doubling of his jail term.

Child “grooming” sentence to be increased

–>A 48 year old  man is being held on three counts of child rape in a case involving a girl he met on the Internet. He met the 13-year-old girl through an instant messaging service on the internet , and flew Central to New York and had sex with her. He  allegedly sent pictures of himself, including some nude photos, and picked her up from her high school. He is accused of taking to girl to a local hotel, where they had sex.

Hollister Man charged in rape case involving minor he met on the internet

Internet Troll Owned

Race hate message man jailed

Agencies
Friday October 6, 2006
Guardian Unlimited
 
 

A man who posted racist messages on a website in memory of murdered black teenager Anthony Walker was jailed for more than three years today.Neil Martin, 30, emailed at least six comments to the website - less than a week after Anthony was killed with an ice axe in a racist attack in Huyton, Merseyside, last year.

The site was set up by a school friend of the 18-year-old. Posting under the pseudonym Genuine Scouser, Martin suggested that white people should celebrate the murder, that Anthony’s family should be burned and made references to slavery and a “banana boat”.

After the verdict, Anthony’s mother, Gee Walker, said she was satisfied by the sentence and did not accept a written apology Martin had sent her.When he was arrested in September, officers also found 33 images of child pornography on his computer.

Martin, from Maghull, Merseyside, pleaded guilty at earlier hearings to publishing material likely to stir up racial hatred and to making indecent photographs of children.

He was sentenced at Liverpool crown court to two years and eight months’ in jail for the race hate crime and six months consecutively for the child pornography offences.

Judge Henry Globe QC, the recorder of Liverpool, told Martin: “The intention of the website was innocent, honourable and well motivated.

“You accessed that website and you abused its use. You posted highly abusive, insulting and racist messages on the site.”

During police interviews, Martin admitted posting the messages but insisted he was not racist. He told the officers he had intended to stir up an argument on the website but did not believe in what he had written.

Heather Lloyd, defending, said Martin had no history of racist behaviour and that he felt “deeply ashamed”.

She said: “He was isolated and living in a fantasy world, spending hours on his computer in his room where his persona could be as he made it, good or bad.”

The court heard that Martin had also created an internet profile using Anthony’s name and photograph, and that he also posed as a schoolgirl on teenage chatrooms.

Miss Lloyd said her client had written a letter of apology to both the court and the Walker family.

Speaking outside court, Mrs Walker said: “After hearing what he said in those messages, I don’t buy it. I don’t accept it. He had time to think about it and he did it six times. I don’t accept his apology.

“Hitler started with an idea, slavery started with an idea, so it is good that this was stopped in time.”

After the verdict, Anthony’s mother, Gee Walker, said she was satisfied by the sentence and did not accept a written apology Martin had sent her.When he was arrested in September, officers also found 33 images of child pornography on his computer.

Martin, from Maghull, Merseyside, pleaded guilty at earlier hearings to publishing material likely to stir up racial hatred and to making indecent photographs of children.

He was sentenced at Liverpool crown court to two years and eight months’ in jail for the race hate crime and six months consecutively for the child pornography offences.

Judge Henry Globe QC, the recorder of Liverpool, told Martin: “The intention of the website was innocent, honourable and well motivated.

“You accessed that website and you abused its use. You posted highly abusive, insulting and racist messages on the site.”

During police interviews, Martin admitted posting the messages but insisted he was not racist. He told the officers he had intended to stir up an argument on the website but did not believe in what he had written.

Heather Lloyd, defending, said Martin had no history of racist behaviour and that he felt “deeply ashamed”.

She said: “He was isolated and living in a fantasy world, spending hours on his computer in his room where his persona could be as he made it, good or bad.”

The court heard that Martin had also created an internet profile using Anthony’s name and photograph, and that he also posed as a schoolgirl on teenage chatrooms.

Miss Lloyd said her client had written a letter of apology to both the court and the Walker family.

Speaking outside court, Mrs Walker said: “After hearing what he said in those messages, I don’t buy it. I don’t accept it. He had time to think about it and he did it six times. I don’t accept his apology.

“Hitler started with an idea, slavery started with an idea, so it is good that this was stopped in time.”

Five ways to defeat blog trolls and cyberstalkers

April 27, 2007 (Computerworld) — Anyone who has participated in the blogosphere in the past two months knows the troubling story of Kathy Sierra, a prominent blogger who was the victim of online threats that included violent sexual acts and murder (“Death threats force woman to suspend blog, cancel talk at O’Reilly conference”). When the harassment spread beyond her own blog to two others that were affiliated with other prominent bloggers, Sierra became so terrified that she canceled an upcoming speaking engagement and took a hiatus from blogging.

But Sierra isn’t the only one to endure online harassment. In fact, some would argue that she’s just the most visible — if not the most historically egregious — tip of an iceberg that has been around since Internet discussions began in the early 1980s. “Between now and the early days of Usenet, the level of abusive behavior has been distressingly constant,” says Tim Bray, a veteran blogger and director of Web technologies at Sun Microsystems Inc.

The difference is, with 70 million blogs in existence today and 1.4 new blogs created every second, according to blog search engine Technorati Inc., there are just more people participating in online discussions, and “the more crazy people you’ve got reading them, the wilder the whole blogosphere can become,” says Richard Silverstein, who advocates for a peaceful approach to solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in his blog.

And he should know. Like Sierra, Silverstein is the victim of online harassment, in the form of hostile comments on his own blog, in external discussion groups and on blogs created solely for the purpose of maligning him. Given the topic that he blogs about, Silverstein is no stranger to abusive commentary. “It’s part of the territory — if you want to write a blog like this, you’re going to deal with unpalatable people,” he says.

But when the external blogs — whose creators were anonymous — grew increasingly threatening, including what he saw as pornographic photographs, he began to feel personally harassed. “I’ve felt insecure and under threat,” he says. “No one has said, ‘I’m going to come and kill you,’ but there were some comments that got me concerned. You hate to think of these things, but it’s very possible that some wacko will escalate from a threatening comment to actually doing something.”

Silverstein has been able to uncover the identities of the bloggers, but he’s been unable to force the blogs’ removal, despite repeated correspondence with Blogger.com, which cites Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act that shields providers of content creation tools from liability for the content users create. In an e-mail sent to Silverstein, Blogger.com said that the site “does not remove allegedly defamatory, libelous or slanderous material from Blogger.com or BlogSpot.com,” pursuant to Section 230, although it did remove the photographs because they were copyrighted images.

While both Silverstein and Sierra are higher-profile bloggers than many of us, it’s clear that anyone who enters the blogosphere needs to be aware of the types of people who get satisfaction out of online harassment. According to Derek Wood, vice president of clinical operations at PsychTracker Inc., a journaling site for people with mental illness, the harassment comes in two general forms: trolls and cyberstalkers. It’s important for blog participants to understand the psychological makeup of both types so that if they encounter any type of online abuse, they’ll have some idea of what they’re facing and how to respond to it.

So, You Want to Learn About Trolls…

Thanks www.lotsofkids.com for the following:

So, You Want to Learn About Trolls…

Recently I was asked to write an article on trolls for a group of board moderators on another website. I was very surprised that several of the people had little to no knowledge about trolls. It was suggested that I should make this information public in the hopes of helping others identify this threat.

I would first like to note that in my experiences on the Web, and as a site host, I have learned that a majority of the people who surf the Internet, post on message boards and chat rooms, and generally befriend each other, are real, legitimate, true, and honest people. Because of the dangers out there, some people may be more reluctant to share information and therefore can appear suspicious, but they are certainly not deceitful or out to intentionally hurt others.

There is a small group that are dishonest and deliberately target and attack others. The anonymous nature of internet life has allowed them to take advantage and downright hurt people. I am a true believer that the main defense against these individuals is education. I will also note that I don’t claim to be an authority on this subject. As a site owner, I have done extensive research on this issue and therefore have had a lot of “hands on” experience dealing with trolls, giving me a significant amount of real life reference. I hope our readers will find this information helpful.

I thought a troll was something from a Lord of the Rings book?

The term troll comes from the word “trolling”, not from the mythical green character; it means to drag a hook along a waterbed and hope you catch something. This is what these particular individuals do. They cast their bait–their stories, their drama, etc.–in the hopes someone will bite. They cause trouble on message boards, chat rooms, email groups, or other gathering places on the Web.

How can I tell someone is a troll?

You really can’t, and that is usually the biggest problem. However, with time, you can learn certain indicators that can help identify a possible troll. I should note that one or two “odd” things does not mean someone is a troll. Truth is, some people have led unusual lives and sometimes life can be crazier than fiction. It is usually after an extended period, and after a significant number of “red flags”, when you can truly suspect a troll.

There are several types of trolls. Different people have different names for them, but you’ll find their tactics are basically the same:

Fake trolls — These are people who are outright liars. They make up stories and fabricate a history so they can slip into a group and join them. They tend to surf the ‘Net beforehand and gather pieces of real life stories of others, adding them to their own so they sound legitimate. They will do research on medical conditions so they can sound knowledgeable. You can usually see a pattern in these people. Their stories are often overly dramatic. They seem quick to share deeply personal information with strangers. When they talk about medical issues, it’s almost textbook, like they are copying off a medical information sheet, or on the flip-side it is purely anecdotal with no references or proof to back it up.

The “real” troll. — This is a real person who is probably completely honest about who they are and their family status. However, they are very needy people and tend to dominate conversations. They embellish their lives, exaggerating real stories to get sympathy and to make people like or love them. They seem to one-up everyone, always having had a better/worse/scarier/happier experience.

Real trolls may also be “mostly” true. Meaning, they may share their real name, email or home address, and other personal information as a way of authenticating themselves. But, they are a truly a combination of real and fake, in the sense they make up all the details of their lives (family status, medical condition, etc.) to slip into various groups.

A sub-set of the real troll is what I call the “vague troll.” They are real people, but just so happen to be troublemakers. They usually are the type who in high school were in cliques, talked about other people, and liked to cause trouble for the “ha ha” factor. While it is arguable that they are not true trolls, these people can hurt a group since they cause trouble and alienate certain members of a community.

Destroyers — The last type of troll really needs a totally different category. While their numbers represent a small fraction of the people on the Internet, this group is the most dangerous. They have one purpose, to break-up a site, group, etc. They start debates on controversial subjects for no other reason than to stir up trouble. They post hateful anonymous comments to cause confusion and upset between board members. They will flame a person (i.e. make a deliberate and personal attacking statement), or make generalized derogatory statements about a group, belief, practice, or other ideology. Don’t be fooled, these people are not doing it because they have a need to express a belief or feeling; they use these deeply emotional issues to start arguments, “flame-wars”, because they love to watch the chaos it causes. These people are troubled and have a need to hurt and destroy.

A sub-set of the Destroyers is the “Hard Luck Case.” Another very dangerous group, they are outright con-artists. They know that people are good natured and want to help each other. They will join a group and endear themselves to the members. At first, they vaguely mention their problems, but things inevitably get worse. Whatever the story is, ultimately the person ends up with a need and asking for help. Sometimes it’s the single mother who can’t afford her rent; she may not ask outright, but she is quick to take the offers of money. Or it could be a need for baby stuff. One woman on an internet group was supposedly too poor to buy her baby necessities. She didn’t want money–she just needed a diaper pail, car seat, etc. She got them, lots of them, and was found turning around and selling them on eBay. Of course, the typical cons are out there too–investments and get-rich schemes. These individuals belong in the destroyer group because they only worry about their gain. They don’t care if they destroy a board with their lies, as long as they can make a profit. And ultimately, these people can destroy a board, since people get gun-shy after these types of incidents and are less willing to trust anyone again.

Regardless of what kind of troll you encounter, remember, they are dangerous. Even a person who is overly needy and constantly craves attention can be detrimental to a group if people start refraining from posting because they don’t want to “start in” with that person.

What are some of the “red flags” you talked about?

Red flags are merely behavior that draws suspicion. Once again, I would advise that a member first be given the benefit of the doubt. As mentioned before, the truth is that we live in a hard world and there are people who have suffered and had very difficult lives. There are actual people who, through the power of prayer or positive thought, have obtained healings of medical conditions or had phenomenal things happen to help them in their lives. Some people have more of a need to share and talk about their problems as a way of dealing with them, while others may need to stay secretive about the details of their life to feel comfortable.

Keeping that in mind, here are some common tactics trolls use:

Confusion: One of the main ways to do this is to post anonymously. The troll will say something, not revealing who they are, and will cause suspicion and fear among a group. People will begin to wonder if one of their trusted members could be the anonymous poster, and it can seed great doubt. Many times these people are lurkers (individuals who visit a board and never post, thus not making their presence known), and thus they are invisible until they attack, making it difficult to safeguard against them. Another way trolls accomplish confusion is to post using a name similar to an existing member of a group. For example: Christine is a respected member, but suddenly a Christne appears (notice one letter off). When the troll posts, people may not immediately realize it is not the trusted member and derogatory comments can be erroneously attributed to the real person.

Inconsistency: Once someone has told so many fabrications, it is difficult to keep track of their lies. You will often find that these peoples have inconsistencies, contradictions, and sometimes gaping holes in their stories. Do remember that typing in an online forum is not an exact science, especially when posting quickly or in a fast moving chat. People make typos and mistakes–and the truth is sometimes people can forget, or rather misquote their children’s ages or another minor detail of their life. I myself am guilty of calling one child by another child’s name, and when online certain similar lapses can happen. The difference is, with trolls you will find that the inconsistencies go far beyond that. Their children’s names may change, or one week they may be the father of 3 and the next a father of 6. They may say they are in one profession, then the next week say they are in a completely different field. Significant details of their life differ from post to post. Many times details of their lives are clearly impossible. One woman on a message board claimed to have a terrible illness, which other members of the group later learned was fatal–however the woman continued to post for well beyond a period in which a person could have survived such a disease.

Emotional Warfare: This is one of the most dangerous weapons of a troll. They realize that people are good natured and they are quick to use guilt, sadness, and anger against them. They will find someone else who has similar life experiences as they purport and try to align with them. If you confront them, they will display deep sadness, claiming they are being falsely accused and devastated. They will use guilt tactics. They oftentimes turn the situation around, saying how victimized they feel, when the truth is they have continually victimized your group. Usually when sadness, guilt, and other manipulations do not work, their emotions turn to anger. They state they are angry being charged unjustly. While it is normal for a person to exhibit such emotions when their character is challenged, in the instance of a troll you must detach yourself long enough to look at the facts.

A few other notable traits of a troll: In some instances, in particular when the troll is a trusted member of a community, you will find that the person has an unusual interest in trolls and helping the staff hunt them out. They seem overly intolerant of trolls as a way of smokescreening their own activities. They are curious, and want to know what information members and staff have about suspected trolls, sometimes even inquiring to site owners and board moderators about security and tracking measures. I liken this to a perpertrator in a crime investigation; they oftentimes offer to assist in the investigation, seemingly being very helpful, asking a lot of “thoughtful” questions, but it is merely a self-serving tactic to find out if the police suspect them and what evidence they might have.

Why do trolls do this?

This is a question that is not easily answered. Obviously, the con artists are looking to profit from it. But other trolls are more curious. Their reasons are as vast and different as the human psyche. Some lead boring lives and may find enjoyment in playing out the stories they have created. Some suffer from severe depression or other conditions, and have a need to cause trouble to make themselves feel better. Low self-esteem causes many people to hate their lives or feel they are not exciting enough to be liked or loved, so they fabricate stories, conditions, or personalities so that others will pay attention to them and feed that basic psychological need to have people care about them. Some trolls are deeply disturbed, filled with hate and resentment. They destroy to exhibit power and manipulate others. Some feel they have no control over their own lives, and it gives them pleasure to feel they have control over others. Others actually identify with their online character and feel it more real than themselves, essentially living in a fantasy world. No one can be sure why a particular troll does what he/she does, which is what makes this situation both frustrating and very sad.

It should be noted that a fair amount of trolls have been discovered to be teenagers. Sometimes out of boredom, or the juvenile need to stir up trouble, these kids come out. They have fun passing themselves off as adults and causing problems. Teens, however, are usually easier to detect since their immaturity can be very apparent at times, and their presence on the web will show patterns, like never posting during school hours, more during school breaks, etc.

One thing that should be noted, most trolls get extreme pleasure in the mere fact they are able to pull off their “scam.” When a person fabricates a character and passes them off in a group setting, they feel smart and clever. In fact, some trolls will even purposely throw inconsistencies into the fray, as a way of pushing their luck. Simply getting away with the ruse is not enough after a while, they have to find out how much more they can get away with before getting caught. In some instances, you will find that a troll wants to get caught, since they may be bored with the current charade and want to move on to another one.

How do you deal with a troll?

The one thing that trolls all have in common is that they want attention. They want people to like them, fear them, revere them, post to them. They want to monopolize a group. You’ll often find when their regular posts don’t get that much attention, they keep upping their stories, make the drama more dramatic so people will pay attention to them. Sometimes they just resort to getting mean and attacking. Anything to get a rise.

That said, the key phrase and absolute best advice is “don’t feed the trolls.” The thing that a troll hates the most is to be ignored. They have to create conflict and get attention in order to fill that psychological need. If they are ignored…if they can’t cause trouble…if they do not get attention, it’s no fun for them and they usually move on elsewhere.

——————————————————————————–

In closing, I would like to reiterate that most people on the Internet are legitimate. As a site owner, I have found myself suspicious of certain individuals, only to later learn and be reassured they were who they claimed to be. Truth is, most people are real and sincere.

Please don’t let the following information scare you or make you leery of joining an Internet group. Trolling is a form of terrorism, a form of control. As with fighting any kind of terrorism, we cannot give in to our fears. Trolls get delight in causing panic and distress in people. By continuing to post, interact, and go on with our lives, we deprive these individuals of their power. Our best defense is to ignore them and continue on as we normally would.

The Internet Troll As The Trickster Archetype

Author and Source: http://www.drewspeak.com/

“The troll comes to the door of a new forum and sets down his bag of tricks. If he has a grudge against the people inside discussing and debating their passions with a certain degree of amicability, peacability and decorum, he does not show them. He has the cracked, stoic smile of Robin Goodfellow, a Puck with the simple desire to disrupt peace itself. He loves chaos; his bag is full of golden apples he can lob to set the masses squabbling. He has also many masks, smoke bombs, straw men, cloaks, puppets, matches, ethanol, knives, dust, sand, and magicks of the most arcane sort. He knows what he is about - causing trouble. Why? This is the troll’s darkest mystery - if any one knew his secret, he would die. For all trolls, their motive power is this: without contraries, they cannot progress.”

I composed this in my notebook a while back; it seemed an exciting way to portray the rapidly-shifting identities and nuisance/amusement factors of these all-too familiar faces in all my old Usenet haunts. I do not deny that a certain nostalgia colours this imagery: the truth is, I was once an Internet troll, “back in the day” when I was an angry, atheist teenager on an AOL account. You know the type, I’m sure. Let me tell you: I trolled pretty hard. That’s all behind me, of course, and I don’t regret having outgrown the adrenaline rush of just rolling out and pissing off some Christian group, a WebTV board or a wrestling forum. It had its thrill at the time, but I eventually just figured out I would probably piss more people off writing my own blog than I would trolling anyone else’s. I offer no apologies for this. I imagine a sizable percentage of regular Internet posters have some small, guilty history of trolling - it’s been a common phase among a lot of the posters I’ve come in contact with over the years.

I do not necessarily wish to excessively extol the virtues and powers of the Internet troll; these persons are typically not quite so epic as they are a nuisance. They are readily the bane of many close-knit Internet communities, descending like a swarm of ethereal locusts from cursed heaven - a fantasy plague of boors eradicating established social orders with malice and confusion.

An article printed in the Washington Post entitled ominously “Female bloggers harassed, menaced” depicts the unfortunate story of Kathy Sierra, a blogger and software developer who had a horrifying ordeal with anonymous trolls: someone apparently posted images of her with a noose around her neck, someone made numerous threats and crafted images involving her being suffocated, her throat being slit, her being ejaculated on, etc., all presumably laden with a psychotically-creepy-murderous inflection. The woman eventually canceled a speaking arrangement at the O’Reilly Emerging Technology conference and went “underground” and blogged under a pseudonym, after announcing on her website: ““I have canceled all speaking engagements, I am afraid to leave my yard, I will never feel the same. I will never be the same.” Horrifying, sociopath behavior like this constitutes one of the potentialities of the troll: the individual who is truly vicious, twisted, obsessed and angry, an ugly, anonymous, dark-minded person with a hellbound will to do you pain. I imagine this image might stir some atavistic archetype: is this not the type of creature nightmares are made of? This, certainly, should be seen as an aspect of the devil.

Dear reader, I understand I’m relying heavily on phantasmal and fantastic imagery to examine this phenomenon: I believe it is crucial, then, when attempting to diagram the complex sociology of the Internet community, one recognize the mythical, virtual qualities of the medium. I hope that we can forgive this elevated language, or perhaps even accept it and play around with it, to see what ideas can emerge when viewing these “obvious” trends in Internet sociology through the painfully anachronistic context of old pagan gremlins.

The landscape which surrounds the Internet troll shimmers with the potentiality of violence, the unspoken simmering of anger and resentment towards the harasser as things get furiously heated. The shooter at the Case Western rampage, a 65-year old with confirmed “severe personality disorder” named Biswanath Halder was apparently motivated by this post from an anonymous troll to his website’s guestbook (http://web.archive.org/web/20031215053508/http://halder.ws/) : “Bizzy Halder is a moron. This guy makes a living out of creeping people out. From his fake hair, to his fake teeth, his whitey tighty shorts and pants, to his shit stained sweaters this guy is a LOON. He’s been kicked out of every lab on campus and everyone makes fun of him. So let’s not even talk about credibility. Don’t listen to a word this guy says.” Shortly afterwards, he opened fire on Case Western with an automatic weapon, apparently attempting to target the troll, a co-worker he suspected of having hacked his website in the past. Neither the man he killed nor the others wounded were the troll. The delusional Indian man had been, quite literally, swinging at spirits, or in this case, shooting at spirits.

Internet trolls can have real power. They can alter your emotional landscape, insert their presence very tangibly into your life. Being trolled can be a harrowing experience. Because of the implicit anonymity built into Internet dialogue, the user often has no clear idea who is harassing him/her - they are confronted only by an adversary who might be represented only by an alphanumeric “name” and a barrage of abuse. There is often little recourse against the offending party. Back in the day when I trolled Usenet, many persons tried to report me as violating my ISP’s Terms of Service to no avail. I received not one single piece of mail from my Internet provider asking me to stop being such a pain in the ass, despite the fact that I was very obviously flooding newsgroups with flames and nonsense, enough to render legitimate conversation impossible. In the instances where physical threats and the like are leveled, there is a venue for law enforcement to get involved, and rightfully so, but rarely are trolls ever quite that vicious. Most of the time, flames will fall within the bounds of protected, free speech: one can no more muzzle a blatant troll than he can any other dissenting view.

A classic rule of thumb has ever been: do not feed the trolls, and many a new user has been regaled with this adage in the face of an inflammatory poster; the problem is, few persons are willing to heed this familiar warning. One might note similarities in this attitude to that of Americans in the aftermath of the 9/11 World Trade Center and Pentagon; when confronted with the premise of ideological terrorism, it is the typical human response to fight fire with fire, trade blow for blow. In mediums of the ideological, textual, and memetic, however, fighting back against malicious phantasms is unproductive. When one is literally “swinging at spirits”, these spirits gain power and substance they hitherto do not possess. It is through opposition and response that they gain validity, become “real” enough to cause the stir and scenes they aim to make.

Moderation features are often nearly useless against these guys: erasing a post makes a troll only more determined to write the same sort of message again, and banning a troll practically guarantees he will darken your doorstep again with a vengeance. I read an account of a Slashdot troll once who claimed to have scripts constantly fishing for proxy servers and free e-mail accounts so that he could consistently hold hundreds of accounts simultaneously in order to vote himself to whatever position he pleased via the meta-moderation system; while I cannot guarantee the veracity of this man’s account, it nonetheless demonstrates the level of effort a troll is willing to exert into making his point. And while I would imagine that each individual troll has his own agenda, this all begs the question - what, exactly, is the point of trolling?

Chaos, discord, controversy, argument; the troll often serves as the Erisian element, capable of galvanizing and polarizing unsuspecting groups with his tricks. What’s the point? Maybe it’s fun to push the limits, to agitate people, to vent one’s hostile emotions at unsuspecting, real persons under the mask of anonymity. Maybe it’s an outlet for real cruelty and vehemence, maybe it’s a hobby, anything could be driving the motivated troll. There are troublemakers in all sorts of settings, in all sorts of mythologies - a troll can be equated to Loki or Anansi just as easily as they could a vitriolic bigot. Who knows? All I understand is that the Internet troll exists by the grace of those who give him a voice; without that, he is nothing.